Search for: "State v. Roth" Results 141 - 160 of 432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
SB 540 (Roth), adds Article 10.10 (§ 65620 et seq) to the Government Code, relating to land use. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Consider the following five examples: “When to Lose a Case and Win a Cause” (discussing Justice William Brennan’s Janus-like obscenity opinion in Roth v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that one of the grants, in Janus v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm
" Rule 3.1113 provides rules for the memorandum in support of the motion, and rule 3.1113(j) states that "[t]o the extent practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the notice of motion. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:20 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) -- IPKat's Eibhlin Vardy has made a detailed summary for you.And the weekly routine, Around the IP blogs! [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
  This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal:  Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) (available here). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
 Ohio Elections Commn., 514 U.S. 334, 346 (1995), quoting from Roth v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Center for Competitive Politics, Luke Wachob “discusses three consequences of an America without the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Buckley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Yes, there was a dissent [ ROTH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom McKEE, Chief Judge. [read post]