Search for: "State v. Rotolo" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2012, 8:09 pm
A few months back we posted an article addressing the question to what extent are local governments liable for damages or injuries resulting from damaged roadways. (1) The State Supreme Court recently settled that question when it issued its ruling on Polzo v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
If, after reading the following, you need a Hunterdon County lawyer to assist you with child support issues, contact The Rotolo Law Firm, located in Lebanon, NJ. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:54 pm
The Rotolo Law Firm is an 8-attorney team, conveniently located on Route 22, minutes from Route 31 and Route 78, in Lebanon, NJ [read post]
13 May 2012, 9:36 am
If, after reading the following, you need a Hunterdon County lawyer to assist you with a similar situation, contact the family law attorneys at The Rotolo Law Firm in Lebanon, N.J. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:19 am
According to the court, while custody can be transferred, parental rights, or autonomy, cannot. (2) If you or someone you know needs the assistance of an attorney for a child custody or parental rights issue in the State of New Jersey - specifically in Hunterdon County or the surrounding area, please contact the family law attorneys at The Rotolo Law Firm [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm
New Jersey’s Civil Union Act was adopted in 2006 following the Supreme Court’s decision in Lewis v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:59 am
Just this past week, the Supreme Court was considering the extent of local governments’ liability to repair potholes as it reviewed the case of Polzo v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
  There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]