Search for: "State v. Rowles"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2008, 2:40 pm
More information about the case is available on the CIS website at: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/case/rowling-v-rdr-books -- Lauren Gelman Executive Director Center for Internet and Society Lecturer in Law Stanford Law School [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Ent. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
The tabloid accused Headley of being a “cosmetic cowboy”, falsely stating that she had botched the treatment of customers. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 7:24 am
This, as Rowles J.A. noted, “risks perpetuating the very disadvantage and exclusion from mainstream society theCode is intended to remedy” (see Brooks v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 12:30 am
United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
R. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Patterson on the Rowling v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:04 am
Break-and-enter charges dropped, East Gwillimbury daughter finally moves into late dad's home ‘Harry Potter’ author JK Rowling settles suit against lawyer who disclosed she wrote new novel Appeals court sides with college athletes in suit over licensing rights on video game U.S. prosecutors argue Manning’s leaks changed how military allows analysts to access data Sammy Yatim ‘wasn’t stable,’ says witness on streetcar B.C. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:30 pm
(iii) It seems to me the parties are generally entitled to state their respective cases in such a statement and their respective admissions. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:08 pm
In 2005, Ms Rowling obtained a further injunction (in an unreported decision) in respect of the next book in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm
Rowling and not at the Claimant. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Q. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:31 am
There is an existing precedent from the English court in this respect: the case of Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Limited. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
While the defendant’s petition for rehearing was pending, the Circuit decided Rowling v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:18 am
In last week’s case (Heyman v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm
As reported by The Times, Rowling’s lawyer stated that the settlement “purport[s] to change US and international copyright rules. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
None of the accusations are true, he states. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm
Rowling’s Harry Potter series. [read post]
