Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 181 - 200 of 1,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
The procedural safeguards available to the individual will be especially material in determining whether the respondent State has, when fixing the regulatory framework, remained within its margin of appreciation. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:41 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Plymouth City Council v G (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 1271 (10 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB) (10 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Rycroft, R (on the application of) v The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain [2010] EWHC 2832 (Admin) (10 November 2010) Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh CaseRichard Clayton9. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 (15 April 2008) London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 (15 April 2008) YB (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 360 (15 April 2008) High Court (Family Division) Nottingham City Council v G & Ors [2008] EWHC 540 (Fam) (18 March 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Office of Government Commerce v… [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the individuals do not have qualified immunity from First Amendment liability, which means the case can forge ahead.The case is Royal Crown Day Care, LLC v. [read post]
Royal Dutch Shell, manages to raise an even broader question: Are there any substantive limits to the federal government’s power to regulate matters occurring outside and having nothing do with the United States? [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Last month PR guru Max Clifford was ordered to pay the former Royal Butler Paul Burrell £5,000 compensation for the unauthorised disclosure of private information contained within a letter Mr Burrell had sent him. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 2:23 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Nwankwo & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 5 (12 January 2018) Preston New Road Action Group v Secretary of State for Communities & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 9 (12 January 2018) Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co Ltd v Andreas Vgenopoulos & Ors [2018] EWCA Civ 1 (12 January 2018) High Court (Administrative Court) Boskovic, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable of… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:05 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) WZ (China) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 795 (23 June 2017) Halborg v EMW Law LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 793 (23 June 2017) The Secretary of State for the Home Department v MM (Zimbabwe) [2017] EWCA Civ 797 (22 June 2017) High Court (Administrative Court) Alderson v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2017] EWHC 1415 (Admin) (23 June 2017) Lusinga… [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:23 pm by tuglaw
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in an unpublished decision rendered in December 2011, in Johnson v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:56 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Haleemudeen v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 558 (02 May 2014) Mohamed & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 559 (02 May 2014) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Golds, R v [2014] EWCA Crim 748 (02 May 2014) Thompson v R [2014] EWCA Crim 836 (02 May 2014) High Court (Administrative Court) Goldsmith International Business School, R (on the application… [read post]