Search for: "State v. Royal"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Mohamad v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Today we revisit the case of the day from October 28, 2011, Health Science Distributors Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:18 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kapoor v National Westminster Bank Plc & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1083 (05 October 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley [2011] EWHC 1380 (QB) (30 September 2011) Triplot & Anor v Whetter [2011] EWHC 931 (QB) (30 September 2011) Cartlidge Morland (a firm) v Thomas [2011] EWHC 2086 (QB) (30 September 2011) Butler- Creagh v AIDA Hersham… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 4 – 5 April 2011. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 1:02 pm
The court determined that the notes met every element of subsection (C): the notes were "securities" issued by Royal Bank of Canada, the “same issuer” of a security described in subparagraph (A), and were of at least equal seniority to Royal Bank of Canada's common stock. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am
Saskia also acted for a number of insurers in responding to, and appearing before, the Australian Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:04 am
Continuing the food-related nature of our posts on Art. 8, ECHR cases (see, inter alia, here and here) we’ve got a bit of cold borscht from Ukraine in the case of Kryvitska and Kryvitskyy v Ukraine App. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:28 am
"
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:56 am
Supreme Court OB v Aventis Pasteur SA [2010] UKSC 23 (26 May 2010 Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penner, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1155 (05 May 2010) Gill, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1154 (07 May 2010) Miller v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1153 (26 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Shiner & Anor, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 558 (26 May 2010) Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 4:18 pm
S.C.J.) and Chitel v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
Lawfare readers will recall that in March the Supreme Court ordered the case of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum to be re-briefed and reargued to address the additional question of whether the Alien Tort Statute applies to violations of international law occurring in the sovereign territory of other countries. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
See Wiwa v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:32 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am
V. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
The case before the Court is Doe v. [read post]
