Search for: "State v. Rufus"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 2:04 pm
The decision in Lochner v. [read post]
7th Circuit: Muslim Inmate Entitled To Religious Exemption From Strip Searches By Transgender Guards
20 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
In West v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Mouat (1888) and United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
The hurdle is Garcetti v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:48 pm
In Red Wolf Coalition v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:23 am
Patrick Guinane of the NWI Tmes reports today on yesterday's Supreme Court ruling in the case of State of Indiana v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:28 am
Hair v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 5:01 am
An interesting case now being litigated in federal court in Wisconsin.From West v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 6:35 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
One of the most cheerful souls you are ever likely to encounter in the often oh-so-serious world of intellectual property is this Kat's friend and fellow blogger Tania Phipps-Rufus. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
He was 49 and President of the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
” Representative Rufus Spalding of Ohio spoke of the presidency as “this high office of the Government. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:17 am
On February 24, 1908, the Supreme Court decided Muller v. [read post]
