Search for: "State v. Rye"
Results 81 - 100
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Public officer entitled to compensation despite his or her failure to file his or her oath of office
6 Feb 2010, 5:01 pm
"State Supreme Court Justice George B. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:37 pm
” In Gomez v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
They argued that eBay and the later case of Winter v Nat'l Res. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:11 am
Salinger’s “Catcher in the Rye. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:03 am
Yet, in Blanch v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
80
A755A
Paulin (MS) -- Prohibits employers from discriminating against victims of domestic violence or stalking BLURB : Exec. domes. violen. employ. prac
Chapter
Signed Date
Effective Date80
07/07/2009
07/07/2009Last Act: 07/07/09 signed chap.8007/07/09 approval memo.581
A2029A
Sayward -- Authorizes health care professionals licensed in… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:34 pm
Capitol v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Caught in the Rye On Wednesday, District Judge Batts granted a preliminary injunction against the publication of the sequel 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
On July 1, 2009, District Court Judge Deborah Batts entered an Order in the Salinger v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:13 pm
Salinger has not published or authorized the publication of any new narrative for Holden Caulfield since the first publication of The Catcher in the Rye in 1951, and has expressly and publicly stated that he will not do so. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
