Search for: "State v. S. Murphy"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2018, 8:49 pm
The post State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 6:53 am
Tenth Circuit opinion: MURPHY v ROYAL OPINION Order Denying En Banc Petition [amended panel opinion] Here are the merits briefs: Joint Appendix Petitioner’s Briefs Petitioner’s Brief United States Brief in Support of Petitioner States Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioner Environmental Federation of Oklahoma Amicus Brief International Municipal Lawyers Association Amicus Brief Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association Amicus… [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:44 am
Murphy prevailed against Oklahoma in the Supreme Court following the McGirt decision, but was immediately prosecuted and convicted by the United States. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:04 pm
Eleven months after ruling that taxing damage awards for nonphysical compensatory damages violated the United States Constitution, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has reversed itself in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:36 pm
Circuit's stunning decision in Murphy v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:40 am
The Supreme Court of the United States decided Murphy v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:42 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 8:01 am
The court merged appellant’s first-degree ... [read post]
18 May 2018, 5:00 am
Daniel (in the latest round) argues that the best reading of Murphy's definition of acceptable federal preemption excludes all "direct" federal prohibitions on state taxation and regulation. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:18 am
In Murphy v Sloan, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 4179961 (C.A.9 (Cal.)) [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am
There’s no breach of contract when “Twitter’s terms of service expressly state that they reserve the right to ‘suspend or terminate [users’] accounts . . . for any or no reason’ without liability. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Murphy v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
The Case of the Day is Murphy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:46 pm
Nine specs were dismissed prior to the scheduled date of Colonel Murphy's Article 32 hearing (which Colonel Murphy subsequently waived).Interestingly, the Times article states that the larceny specs are unrelated to the licensure issues that formed the original core of the charges. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:49 am
Since my last post on Murphy, several scholars have been debating whether Murphy’s expansion of the anti-commandeering doctrine is significant. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:11 pm
Justice Alito’s opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:09 pm
It's Murphy v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
In Falbo v. [read post]
