Search for: "State v. S.L." Results 161 - 180 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2009, 5:50 am
["If the defendant is neither domiciled nor has an establishment in any of the Member States, such proceedings shall be brought in the courts of the Member State in which the plaintiff is domiciled or, if he is not domiciled in any of the Member States, in any Member State in which he has an establishment".]In the event that national law is to be relied on, is it possible to apply national law where it places on an equal footing (as Spanish law does)… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:17 am
[Article 2.2 of the Services Directive expressly excludes a number of services from its scope, including "(d) services in the field of transport, including port services, falling within the scope of Title V of the Treaty". [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:13 pm
Rolabo, S.L., 437 F.3d 1157, 1165 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm by Pace Law School Library
Del Duca and Gianluca Gentili; articles by Michael Coper, Chuma Himonga, Francis S.L. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Jeff Welty
Third, section 34.30 of the 2014 appropriations bill, S.L. 2014-100, enacted new Article 16B of Chapter 15A. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
Quattrocchi (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) TTAB finds SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION merely descriptive of marketing services (TTABlog) Trademark holder not entitled to domain name registered years before: National Arbitration Forum decision in Arizona State Trailer Sales, Inc. d/b/a Little Dealer Little Prices RV v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
Rolabo, S.L., 437 F.3d 1157, 1161 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:05 am by Jamie Markham
If the revocations run concurrently—as the revoking court may allow in any case, regardless of how the sentences were set to run by sentencing judge, see State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:05 am by Jamie Markham
If the revocations run concurrently—as the revoking court may allow in any case, regardless of how the sentences were set to run by sentencing judge, see State v. [read post]