Search for: "State v. Sachs" Results 321 - 340 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm by Samuel Bray
(Exceptions are posts by Stephen Sachs and Howard Wasserman.) [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
§101 (hereinafter referred to as §101).Robert Sachs (Robert R. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:03 am by Rosalind English
RT (Zimbabwe) and others (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 - read judgment It is no answer to a refugee claim to say that the individual concerned should avoid persecution by lying and feigning loyalty to a regime which he does not support. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
  As the report states, in the case of AIG, the guarantee was extended not only to AIG itself but to its counterparties in its derivatives trades, leaving the government guaranteeing not only banks, but an entire market. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco S.A., heard 17-18 Apr 2018. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“‘Whether a plaintiff can [*2]ultimately establish its allegations is not part of the calculus in determining a motion to dismiss” (Bianco v Law Offs. of Yuri Prakhin, 189 AD3d 1326, 1329, quoting EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 NY3d 11, 19; see Carlson v American Intl. [read post]
10 May 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
 However, a state court found in Preston's favor on Thursday and required the county to pay Preston $700,000 in attorneys' fees. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Sachs, concerning the definitions of "agent" of a "foreign state" under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am by John Jascob
The penalties stemmed from FINRA’s determination that Robinhood violated FINRA Rules 2010, 2210, and 2220 by negligently communicating a wide array of false and misleading information to its customers during certain periods since September 2016.June saw the Supreme Court issue its opinion in Goldman Sachs v. [read post]