Search for: "State v. Salaam"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2014, 6:33 pm
” What prompted the Court’s review of Aguilar-Spinelli in the context of reasonable suspicion is the recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Navarette v California (__ US __, 134 SCt 1683 [2014]). [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:42 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:28 am
In Kenya, the High Court dismissed an application for injunction in Netresource Limited v Ministry of Education & 3 others stating that no prima facie case was established. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:33 am
Jawara v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:48 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:52 pm
Perdue lawsuit and HB-908.Whitaker v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
It was ruled in People v Kearns, People v Hernandez, People v Cash, People v Sumpter, People v Salaam, Matter of Vandover v Czaika and Matter of New York Satae Bd. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:47 am
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY – VANDALISM – INTENT & STATE OF MIND OF THE VANDAL – MALICEGeorgitsi Realty, LLC v Penn-Star Ins. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:34 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:25 pm
Add to this list, the sinking of the SeaBreeze I, the Majestic Explorer, the Al-Salaam Boccaccio, Explorer, M/V Saurav, Queen Of The North, Senopati Nusantara, M/V Bulgaria and the Mikhail Lermontov (which sank in 100 feet of water off the northern tip of New Zealand’s South Island after hitting a reef). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:39 pm
Holder, 598 F.3d 647, 655 (9th Cir. 2010) (mandate pending) (explaining that where the IJ fails to make an explicit credibility finding, he cannot require corroborating evidence); Salaam v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 pm
The court concludes that the signed and sworn supporting affidavit of the burglary victim constituted reliable hearsay and/or a relevant statement of any victim under Correction Law § 168-n [3], and that the court was entitled to consider and rely on such evidence as clear and convincing proof that defendant is a level three risk as ruled in People v Saleemi, People v Victor, People v Jimenez and People v Salaam. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Decided on December 22, 2009 Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 1847 117179/07 [*1]Ted Moustakis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Christie’s, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
For some time now -- ever since ECUSA's unilateral decision to consecrate V. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 6:12 am
The court declined to reinstate the employee’s gross negligence cause of action or to consider his unpreserved retaliation claims (Jacobsen v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp, March 27, 2014, Abdus-Salaam, S). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:36 am
The Court, instead, looked to an older House of Lords judgment, Dubai Aluminium Co Ltd v Salaam [2002] UKHL 48 (“Dubai Aluminium”), in order to consider the test “afresh”. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:53 am
Justice Smith filed a separate concurring opinion, while Justice Rivera dissented (Santer v Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, May 6, 2014, Abdus-Salaam, S). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:34 am
Salaam v. [read post]
