Search for: "State v. Scales" Results 61 - 80 of 5,251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Having one party incognito but not the other can tilt the scales of justice in the direction of guilt by anonymous accusation, a prospect which would be just as abhorrent to civil litigation as it is to our criminal justice system. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
This Article is especially critical of the state action doctrine best known from Blum v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by Keaoleboga Molefe
In Minister of Agriculture v Bluelilliesbush Dairy Farming (270/07) [2008] ZASCA 60 (29 May 2008), the Supreme Court of Appeal considered compensation following an outbreak of bovine tuberculosis where 7 000 cattle were slaughtered by the State in terms of the Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:27 am by Tessa Shepperson
Jonanthan Gordon, a high profile letting agent of Clan Gordon agency has hit out at the government and is now lobbying them saying that these latest regulations have ‘major flaws’ and the time scales are too short to adhere to them. [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 10:48 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:07 pm by Jason Kelley
United States, ruling 5-4 that the Fourth Amendment protects cell phone location information. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many were, understandably, daunted by the scale of the work, and also by the scrutiny to which it would be subjected. [read post]