Search for: "State v. Schulze"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am
Ratification by more states in which a talaq is a legally effective form of divorce and by more European states would provide the much-needed security for families moving from Islamic states to Europe. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
This limited release of information is to ensure the art market’s understanding and acceptance of the final determination.[16] The most famous art arbitration concerned Maria Altmann and her efforts to recover six Gustav Klimt paintings from the Republic of Austria.[17] These paintings originally belonged to her uncle and aunt but were confiscated by the Nazis in 1938, eventually ending up in the Austrian State Gallery in Vienna. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
SCHULZ, “Political private international law. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Stacey Gray argued that the American Data Privacy and Protection Act would provide protections that are stronger than state protections, establishing a strong national standard for privacy. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
In an ironic twist, the Times v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm
Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 9:58 am
Anderson were joined by Molly Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news including alleged war crimes committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and Torres v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:44 am
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
Daphne Keller explained how the Adalah v. [read post]
