Search for: "State v. Schutte Investment Company"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 8:11 pm
" Riddell counters by stating that neither the company nor its employees have taken any action which violates the automatic stay because "none of the communications [cited by Schutt] indicate any effort by Riddell to coerce or harass the Debtors into paying Riddell's $29 million pre-petition claim against the Debtors, or otherwise violate any provision of section 362(a)(1) through (8). [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:49 pm
He started as a claims manager in 1927, and his career grew along with the Company, as it expanded to be a multi-line insurer writing policies in 11 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]