Search for: "State v. See" Results 161 - 180 of 80,972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
 Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives)  in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
DIP Financing Key Terms Tracker State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Watch and learn from our collection of 750 videos, gathered conveniently in the new Practice Videos Resource Kit . [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Wade, but now that Roe has been overruled, it is difficult to see why that matters. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm by michael
If you want to see if you qualify for chapter 7 bankruptcy in the state of Arizona, call for your free consultation at 480-470-0005. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am by centerforartlaw
”[46] While being interviewed at another site, al-Mahdi announced that “[w]hat you see here is one of the ways of eradicating superstition, heresy, and all things or subterfuge which can lead to idolatry. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Enough was revealed, however, to see that the published articles were not what they claimed to be.[6] In addition to litigation discovery, in March 1996, a surgeon published the results of his test of the Shanklin-Smalley silicone sensitivity test (“SILS”).[7] Dr. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:25 am by Sara Robinson
We’re even seeing state agencies attempt to use the CIA’s non-response to circumvent local public records requests. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Lipsky v New York State Comptroller, 56 AD3d 1101, the court held that the Comptroller's determination that Petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his assignment was "not supported by substantial evidence in this record and thus must be annulled. [read post]