Search for: "State v. Seeds" Results 1 - 20 of 907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2009, 11:25 am by Agrilawyer
Varieties protected by Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Title V can be sold only as a class of certified seed as will be designated by the individual states. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Buying, selling or transporting those seeds out-of-state though is where things can get dicey. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm by WIMS
As of 2012, Monsanto has filed 142 alleged seed patent infringement lawsuits involving 410 farmers and 56 small farm businesses in 27 states." [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:22 am
I've seen the relevant corporate farms in Kauai, which grow genetically-modified seeds. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am by Eve Brensike Primus
The state court had properly noted that Davenport would be entitled to relief under Chapman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:54 am
The injunction was sought by plaintiffs Geertson Seed Farms and Trask Family Seeds, conventional alfalfa-seed farms, together with environmental groups, because they fear cross-pollination of the new variety with other alfalfa, thereby possibly causing conventional alfalfa to disappear. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:47 am by Guest Barista
The Convention on BioDiversity further distinguishes between: V-Gurt technology controls reproductive processes resulting in seed sterility, thus affecting the viability of the entire variety. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:07 am
The user-agreement does state that farmers are able to sell the second generation seeds to grain elevators for use as commodity seeds, which are often used as animal feed. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:00 am by Todd Janzen
S. 617, 625, and confers on the purchaser, or any subsequent owner, “the right to use [or] sell” the thing as he sees fit, United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  The producer plaintiffs weren’t consumers of Syngenta seeds or even Viptera corn. [read post]