Search for: "State v. Sellers"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
This fee entitled the buyer as a member to access all dog profiles and seller information on the website, including the ratings and reviews of the seller. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 3:47 am
Fruit of the Loom, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
CDC Newburgh Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:10 am
They further stated that sellers should not be required to pay a buyer’s agent commission because a buyer’s agent is not performing services on behalf of a seller. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
Freedom Patents LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
Furthermore, at least three California state appellate court cases–the Bolger, Loomis, and Lee cases–have held that Amazon is the “seller” of everything on its site, including marketplace items. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
Nonetheless, Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
He also defends companies in state consumer protection investigations and data breach responses. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:13 am
Balasco v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
Pest Control will authenticate a Banksy already owned or will work with buyers and sellers to authenticate an item that is in the process of being sold.[30] As is Banksy’s way, the authentication is done in rather clever ways. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Laser at Cleveland State University College of Law. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am
We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 9:26 am
Concerning this often raised defense, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Woods v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am
Most recently, in Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 7:17 am
In Bowein v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Insurers would be required to pay Appian $500 million if the state supreme court rules that Pegasystems should have won. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:40 pm
The term is broadly defined by Cornell Law School, citing Fischer v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm
Building on this, in Impresario Entertainment v. [read post]
