Search for: "State v. Shane" Results 1 - 20 of 376
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2016, 7:05 am by scanner1
CRIMINAL – JUSTICE  COURT APPEAL DA 14-0524, 2016 MT 110N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 2:49 pm by Immigration Prof
Peter Shane in the Washington Monthly does not have much use for the Supreme Court's recent refusal to stay an injunction while an appeal is [pending in United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:26 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0295, 2011 MT 85N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm by Guest Author
Rejecting the originalist and structural arguments against the legislative veto that the Supreme Court offered in INS v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
” “As Professors Mashaw and Shane both seem to recognize, the administrative state is much better at advancing deliberative accountability than electoral or aggregative accountability. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
In particular, Shane endorses a broad theory of the Commerce Clause power under which Congress can legislate on virtually any “national problem” (134) citing in support a passage from Gibbons v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:53 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Prior convictions Appellant, Edward Thompson, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County of one count each of first degree burglary, third degree burglary, attempted burglary, and theft. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:18 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Me Too movement A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Frederick County convicted Michael Bullis (“Appellant”) of fourth-degree sexual offense and second-degree assault. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:30 pm by WSLL
TOZER and SHANE EDEBURNANNE UHR WHITE v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
”  Siegel focuses on what such an argument might look like in the context of constitutional arguments about liberty and equality in the family, but she also touches on how it might have improved upon the male-centered analysis of federalism in United States v. [read post]