Search for: "State v. Sharper"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
This In Sharper Focus post is a supplement to the blog’s preview of the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
This In Sharper Focus Guest Post by Cleveland attorney Harlan D. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 6:36 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 8:52 am
As previously posted, on September 24, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio is hearing oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
To get up to speed on this, stop right now and read this In Sharper Focus post. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
In Sharper Focus Guest Post By Cynthia M. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:58 am
Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Samantar v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 5:06 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 4:30 am
Navigating the Minefield: Lessons of Figueroa v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
Circuit’s opinion in Klayman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
Below is my column in the Hill on how the next round of post-Roe litigation is coming into sharper focus. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:40 am
Walgate v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:04 am
" Virginia Innovation Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:23 am
The recent overdose death of actor Philip Seymour Hoffman brings into sharper relief the issue decided by the Supreme Court last week in Burrage v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:50 am
: Private Publishers Aren’t State Actors–Manhattan Community Access v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:32 am
Hearthware, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:19 pm
From Sharper v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm
Clearly more is required for a provider to acquire a sufficient state of knowledge to be deprived of the statutory protection” [60]. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
In a case brought by Rights of Women determined in February this year, the Court of Appeal concluded that Regulations made under LASPO requiring victims of domestic violence to satisfy onerous evidential requirements directed at establishing the necessary victimhood as a condition of a grant of legal aid, were contrary to the purpose of LASPO and unlawful (R (Rights of Women) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWCA Civ 91). [read post]
