Search for: "State v. Sheldon" Results 121 - 140 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod looks at County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  See generally, Sheldon Howard Laskin, The Nostalgia of Eternity: Interstate Compacts, Time, and Mortality, 49 Rutgers L. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: In a video for ISCOTUSnow, Sheldon Nahmod previews next Monday’s argument in Lane v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:54 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Deanna Gilley, No. 99,156 (Reno)State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:01 am by John Pfaff
Adam Liptak has a depressing piece up in today's New York Times about how states are respodning to the Supreme Court's decision in Graham v Florida, which declared life without parole sentences for minors unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:24 pm by Cindy Cohn
Related Issues: Computer Fraud And Abuse Act ReformRelated Cases: United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm by Matthew Flinn
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – Read Judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
’” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod discusses last week’s decision in Nieves v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(hereinafter J.C.), and J.C.'s client, Sheldon Lowe, trustee under the Sheldon Lowe declaration of trust dated January 15, 1999 (hereinafter Lowe), to recover money it allegedly was owed in connection with the project. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
City of Maplewood] “Does the Excessive Fines Clause Apply to the States? [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am by Adam Wagner
Quila & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1482 – Read judgment A key part of the government’s strategy to combat forced marriages, preventing people under the age of 21 from entering the country to marry, has been heavily criticised by the Court of Appeal. [read post]