Search for: "State v. Sherwood"
Results 1 - 20
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 7:05 am
Colombia) Philipp Janig, X v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am
Co., LLC v New York State Div. of Haus. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
In her cross-motion papers, plaintiff states that there is no record of this second notice of claim, apparently denying any involvement in the alleged refiling. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre·answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
The case is Sherwood Auburn LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 12:31 pm
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In EEOC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 5:00 pm
., Global Blue Group Holding AG v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am
Peter Sherwood is the unusual government case in which a legal malpractice issue is inserted. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am
Guarino v N. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Because we recognize that this is a fair way of proceeding in the context of a serious power-imbalance between the state’s ability to prosecute and the accused’s ability to defend themselves against the power and resources of the state. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas… [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm
SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 11:14 pm
” Justice Sherwood denied the plaintiffs’ motion. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
In reply, Harris stated that it was ARG’ s decision as to whether he would pay for anotherappraisal to support a discount. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:42 am
Taggart v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:43 am
At the end of the litigation, though, the state court ordered Taggart to pay Sherwood’s attorney’s fees. [read post]
