Search for: "State v. Shondel"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
" The article examines the New York Court of Appeals decision in Shondel J. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:53 am
At a preliminary hearing, the defendant successfully invoked State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:18 pm
At a preliminary hearing, the defendant successfully invoked State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 2:26 pm
The appellate panel began by citing New Hampshire v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 11:21 am
The case is Matter of Shondel v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
This court is concerned that a determination should be made prior to the ordering of a DNA test because this case somewhat parallels the case of Shondel J. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:34 pm
In Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 N.Y.3d 320 (2006), the Court of Appeals set forth the law applicable to equitable estoppel in paternity and child support proceedings. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
He also noted other cases involving different-sex couples where courts bound non-biological parents to support obligations, including a recent ruling by the state's highest court, Shondel J. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:31 pm
" Judge Greenberg noted a recent decision by New York's highest court, Shondel J. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 2:16 am
In Shondel J. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Julio J., 20 N.Y.3d 995, 985 N.E.2d 127, 961 N.Y.S.2d 363 (2013) the Court of Appeals observed that before a party can be estopped from denying paternity or from obtaining a DNA test that may establish that he is not the child's biological parent, the court must be convinced that applying equitable estoppel is in the child's best interest (Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320 [2006]). [read post]
