Search for: "State v. Six Mile Ranch"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm
For over 50 years, under the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bivens v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
In Wilkie v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
The property lies more than 20 miles from the nearest highway. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:42 am
Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:22 am
Wabaunsee County is in the eastern part of the state 30 miles west of Topeka. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Appellate court applies deferential standard of review to Newhall Ranch EIR. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
Submits Final Climate Action Report 2010 To UNFCCCPresident Obama Reviews Progress; Outlines Vision For FutureEPA Sets One-Hour SO2 Health Standard At 75 PPBUSGS Study On Effects of Urbanization on Stream EcosystemsEPA Appoints New Members To Farm, Ranch, & Rural CommitteeOIG Looks At EPA Oversight of Federal Agency Superfund ReviewsUSA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
She grew up on the family’s Lazy B Ranch, which sat astride the border between Arizona and New Mexico and occupied about 250 square miles – almost four times the size of Washington, D.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Exemptions Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Six Flags St. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
