Search for: "State v. Smith & Miller" Results 41 - 60 of 550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite;… [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 9:11 am by Steve Kalar
In Judge Smith’s view, the Thornhill panel changed Ninth law (LeMay) with no intervening Supreme Court decision: a Miller v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:59 am
  In any event, the State argued, Wood's claim is foreclosed by Miller-El v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm by Steven Boutwell
Regina, wife of/and Barney Core, Smith and Core, Inc., et al., State of Louisiana Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 2010 CA 1961. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Wallace Tashima's opinion (joined by Judges Milan Smith and Jacqueline Nguyen) in Miller v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:31 am by thejaghunter
Morgan making a cell phone call to state officials, during which he made a police report of the incident to Sergeant Kevin Smith of the Tennessee Highway Patrol. [read post]