Search for: "State v. Souter" Results 141 - 160 of 1,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2009, 9:29 pm
Last week, the court granted review in Ricci v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:15 pm
Justice Souter wrote the opinion. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:57 am
President Obama has nominated Second Circuit Judge Sonia Sotomayor to replace retiring Justice David Souter on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 9:39 am
Contents include:Wyn Bowen & Matthew Moran, Living with nuclear hedging: the implications of Iran's nuclear strategy Jason Ralph & James Souter, A special responsibility to protect: the UK, Australia and the rise of Islamic State Simone Molin Friis, ‘Beyond anything we have ever seen’: beheading videos and the visibility of violence in the war against ISIS Harsh V. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm by Kevin Russell
Coakley, is whether the Court’s 2000 decision in Hill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:35 pm
Of today's three decisions, the most significant is District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:10 am
Souter delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 2:08 pm
Souter, below is a profile of Seventh Circuit Judge Diane P. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:49 pm
Leatherman Tool (2001) (the judicial review of jury verdicts awarding punitives must be "de novo"); State Farm v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:46 am
United States, No. 05-1272, issued 3/27/2007), Justice Stevens (Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:28 am
Along with last term's decision in United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:58 pm
United States, and on Wednesday, April 29, it announced its decision in Kansas v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
  527 U.S. at 658 n.9 (Stevens, J., joined by Souter, Ginsburg & Breyer, JJ., dissenting). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
The district court held that although the state court had not complied with either state law or the requirements imposed by the Court's 1986 decision in Ford v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
Note: The following piece about oral argument in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]