Search for: "State v. Spano" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2009, 9:16 am
Though New York Governor Paterson’s order requiring state agencies to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages has overshadowed this earlier action, Westchester County executive Andrew Spano did issue an order in June 2006 requiring all county agencies under his control to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:01 pm
Godfrey v Spano, 2009 NY Slip Op 08474, Decided on November 19, 2009, Court of Appeals [Decided with Lewis v New York State Department of Civil Service] Plaintiffs in this action are taxpayers challenging directives recognizing out-of-state same-sex marriages for... [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Spano: Is New York's High Court Ready to Recognize Out of State Same Sex Marriages? [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:20 am
"The Supreme Court ruled that the Order was a valid exercise of the County Executive's power, was not an illegal act, and did not violate the State Constitution or the Municipal Home Rule Law [Godfrey v Spano, 15 Misc.3d 809]. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use: Spanos v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am by Tom Lamb
Merck & Co., Inc., 09 Civ. 4282 (JFK), is scheduled for trial on May 7, 2012; and, Spano v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:08 am
Spano Subscription Required WESTCHESTER COUNTY Family Law Court Grants Wife's Motion to Quash Subpoenas, Denies Husband's Cross-Motion for Sanctions Strauss v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:11 am
"The Supreme Court ruled that the Order was a valid exercise of the County Executive's power, was not an illegal act, and did not violate the State Constitution or the Municipal Home Rule Law [Godfrey v Spano, 15 Misc.3d 809]. [read post]