Search for: "State v. Speck"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2022, 4:00 am
ColbIn his draft opinion for the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
Tax reports have not been filed to the state in more than a decade. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Compare Speck v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
And if our jurisprudence really requires us to ignore such sensible policy in favor of fly-specking of 19th century cases about oyster beds and speeches in the 39th Congress, then is our republic not truly ridiculous? [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
For example, a group may consist of doctors admitted to practice medicine in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:59 am
The published opinion I referred to in my earlier post, United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
In WildEarth Guardians, et. al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
About two-thirds into the opening argument in Jennings v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Mr Speck [Counsel for Actavis], for his part submits that it is not appropriate to fix on the word intention and then embark "on a wide ranging review of how the word 'intention' or 'intended' is used in different areas of the law" when the real issue is what the mental element in the claim is. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Pierre v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 8:05 am
Vizcarra v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
[v] The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial at 25-29. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
Wonder whether anyone from Men at Work will be appearing on Spicks and Specks now? [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
This week will see the State Opening of Parliament. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:47 pm
” (4) Page 69 – V. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
Referring to the use of the power to order publications of a summary of court judgments in s.12 of the Defamation Act 2013, and comments made on this by Mr Justice Nicklin in a 2018 case, Lord Justice Warby states [55]: ….Counsel [Mr Speck] went so far as to suggest in writing that in this case this remedy is ‘intended more as a species of punishment and retribution rather than a necessary and proportionate measure in the interests of the claimant or the public’.… [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Judicial review should not encourage that kind of fly-specking or require that the agency produce a flawless document. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:58 am
Richards, Penn State University2. [read post]
