Search for: "State v. Spring City" Results 1 - 20 of 862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Steven G. Pearl
Thank you to Erich Shiners of Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai LLP,  my colleague on the State Bar Labor and Employment Law Executive Committee, for pointing out that the California Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 9:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
Funtana Village, Inc. v City of Panama City Panama, 2016 WL 375102 (ND FL 1/28/16)  Filed under: Current Caselaw, Equal Protection, Uncategorized Tagged: Dormant Commerce Clause, Spring Break Ordiances [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
Here is a recap of Spring 2019’s filings: Chrismon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 5:36 am
State that ORC sec. 9.481 is constitutional, and political subdivisions such as cities and townships cannot condition employment on residency. [read post]
24 May 2020, 6:06 am by Howard Friedman
However the grant came with conditions, reflecting what appears to be ongoing animosity between the church and city officials, and somewhat competing Orders by the state and the city. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:51 am
The United States Supreme Court begins its two week spring break today. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by admin
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Daily Democrat recently reported that the City of Woodland, the League of California Cities, and the California State Association of Counties have submitted a May 2, 2014 depublication request to the California Supreme Court regarding the Third District Court of Appeal’s partially-published decision in California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 9:06 pm by Rebecca Bernhardt
The city, county and state government have increased costs and decreased tax revenue, due to the debtor losing their job and the increased burden on public benefits and social services. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Employee entitled to go for a cancer-screening examination without loss of pay or charge to leave accruals Moran v City of Saratoga Springs, et al, 21 Misc 3d 195 In Cruz et al v Wappingers CSD, Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Judge James V. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:38 am by David Bernstein
  Here’s the beginning: Buchanan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm by Sme
City of Colorado Springs (10th Cir., May 24, 2016) (affirming dismissal of plaintiffs' breach of contract claim (they did not allege a contract) as well as their due process claim (they did not allege a constitutionally protected right to continue participating in the pension plan at issue)Workers' Compensation/Occupational Safety and DiseaseAdair v. [read post]