Search for: "State v. Standing Soldier"
Results 221 - 240
of 359
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2013, 5:36 am
It stands, abandoned and unchanged, casting an unnerving shadow on the memorial center and all those who visit it. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 10:39 am
By Eric Goldman Vesely v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
For instance, Mutes may be less prominent in Canadian constitutional history, whose rules for private and public interest standing are less rigid than the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm
Even before bin Laden’s death, its decimated leadership was barely able to communicate with its few remaining foot soldiers, let alone conceive and execute significant attacks against the United States. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
The lawyer pushes Bogdan’s principles: wouldn’t his soldiers intervene if they saw a visitor misbehaving? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:41 pm
Abd Al-Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Al Nashiri stands charged with serious violations of the law of war for his alleged role in attacking the United States warship USS Cole and the French vessel MV Limburg and in attempting to attack the United States warship USS The Sullivans. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
The American Civil War provides the best example: Just about every one of the Confederate soldiers attacked and detained by Union forces in that conflict were American citizens. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
Importantly, PHR filed an amicus brief in Al Nashiri v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
It is headed by an "ex-bishop" -- a statement which has truth value only within the limited (but, hey -- "inclusive") confines of ECUSA, and not at all within the wider Anglican Communion, the majority of whose provinces treat ECUSA as the "renegade," and regard those whom ECUSA evicts as faithful soldiers for Christ, whose eviction is a badge of merit.Next, there was no "postponement," in the sense of agreeing upon a date on which to take up the injunction again. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 10:27 am
Matt SJC Agrees To Hear Crucial Foreclosure Standing Case In HSBC Bank v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
v=1mDr5j4GQUo Similarly, US soldiers mentioned the poor treatment and virtual slavery of Women in Afghan society, and how they found such practices repugnant. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
v=1mDr5j4GQUo Similarly, US soldiers mentioned the poor treatment and virtual slavery of Women in Afghan society, and how they found such practices repugnant. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
v=1mDr5j4GQUo Similarly, US soldiers mentioned the poor treatment and virtual slavery of Women in Afghan society, and how they found such practices repugnant. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:44 pm
Feb. 15, 2011) and Myers v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
One might argue that those soldiers were no longer U.S. citizens because they were fighting for the Confederacy, but that position is inconsistent with the view—supported by the Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Hyder v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:44 am
As Justice Stevens explained in Perpich v. [read post]
