Search for: "State v. State Fish and Game Commission"
Results 61 - 80
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
California Department of Fish and Game, et al. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission case, decided by the Court in 2013, is an example of the danger to state property that might arise if the federal government has a free hand to restrict and damage state property rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
Washington (Aboriginal Title; Off-Reservation Fishing Rights) Rabang v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 12:01 am
What does the above have to do with the Federal Circuit's opinion in Northwest Louisiana Fish & Game Preserve Comm'n v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am
The Winter Games begin on Feb. 9. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
Following the decisions in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Zinke (Reviewable Final Agency Action; Gaming)Clema v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm
Fish and Game Commission, No. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
The appeal centers around Kern’s argument that DWR is not a person for the purposes of Fish and Game Code section 2080 which provides, “No person shall . . . take . . . any species . . . that the [Fish and Game Commission] determines to be an endangered species, or a threatened species . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:12 am
In State v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm
Judge Braden’s decision relied heavily on a 2012 Supreme Court case, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm
If the Court does rule in favor of the government and, depending on one's view, either (a) significantly narrow the scope of Nollan and Dolan or (b) refuse to extend those decisions to another, similar context, this would appear contrary to the Court's recent decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:28 pm
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:08 am
But Intel (& temporarily Apple) v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:55 am
11-597 ARKANSAS GAME & FISH COMMISSION v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 9:58 am
However, the plaintiffs argued that the United States Supreme Court’s 2012 decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Department of Game, the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
New Mexico Compilation Commission Advisory Committee (Constitutional Amendment) Lustre Oil Company LLC v. [read post]
