Search for: "State v. State Police Officers Council"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am
Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others v Commissioner of Police and Others; and Hermia Tyson-Cuffie v Public Service Commission (Trinidad and Tobago), heard 17 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Council 82, AFSCME], 176 AD2d 1009, lv denied 79 NY2d 756. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:05 am
Bill 21 formally bans teachers, police officers, judges and many others from wearing items like hijabs, turbans, kippas, and crucifixes in the course of their duties. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
The French Conseil Constitutionnel (Constitutional Council), which is in charge of reviewing the constitutionality of laws, had found in 2006 that it is also permissible for administrative police officers to have access to stored electronic communication data without a warrant, but only when acting to prevent acts of terrorism. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
The French Conseil Constitutionnel (Constitutional Council), which is in charge of reviewing the constitutionality of laws, had found in 2006 that it is also permissible for administrative police officers to have access to stored electronic communication data without a warrant, but only when acting to prevent acts of terrorism. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
The French Conseil Constitutionnel (Constitutional Council), which is in charge of reviewing the constitutionality of laws, had found in 2006 that it is also permissible for administrative police officers to have access to stored electronic communication data without a warrant, but only when acting to prevent acts of terrorism. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 2:09 pm
The French Conseil Constitutionnel (Constitutional Council), which is in charge of reviewing the constitutionality of laws, had found in 2006 that it is also permissible for administrative police officers to have access to stored electronic communication data without a warrant, but only when acting to prevent acts of terrorism. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 2:08 pm
On 5 December, a Newham Council officer, together with police, seized a table from the regular Saturday street campaign of Focus E15 – the housing rights protest group. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
" Wisconsin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 7:44 am
The protest prevented the city council meeting from continuing, and police officers warned the protesters that they had to leave the meeting room or they would be arrested. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 11:13 am
Kauai Police Commission Chairman Michael Ching subsequently asked the OIP to determine whether the closed meeting was proper under the state sunshine law. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
Begbie [2000] 1 WLR 1110 at p. 1131; R (Wheeler) v Office of the Prime Minister [2008] EWHC 936 (Admin)). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:04 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership), heard 17 – 20 January 2012. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:13 am
" Pickering v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 9:34 am
The case of Greene v. [read post]
