Search for: "State v. State Supervisory Employees Association"
Results 61 - 80
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2019, 11:55 am
In 2019, legislation required employers to extend training to non-supervisory employees, every two years. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:09 pm
In Fearnow v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 8:50 am
More importantly, an employer is strictly liable for supervisory employees’ sexual harassment regardless of whether the employer knew of conduct. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:23 am
The defendants’ motions to dismiss were granted (Duke v Hamil, February 4, 2014, Story, R). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
It is unlikely that, in enacting the conscience clause, Parliament had in mind the host of ancillary administrative and managerial tasks that might be associated with those acts…. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
The court shall, however, revoke the nonresident's driving privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this State, in accordance with this section. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 8:02 pm
The state can neither directly nor indirectly interfere with an employee’s (or applicant’s) rights to political association and belief. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:32 am
The knowledgeable and experienced sexual harassment attorneys at Phillips & Associates advocate for the rights of job applicants, employees, and former employees in New York City, helping them assert claims for sexual harassment under local, state, and federal laws. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Such conduct was expected to comply with law and it was left to the state and its domestic legal order to deal with those issues. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:10 am
One is for employees and the other for judges. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:38 am
TweetIn Feldman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
Windsor, Ortiz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:42 am
And, of course, the current National Labor Relations Board would find these class waivers unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act, as applied to non-supervisory employees, as our colleagues have noted here, but that view is not finding favor in the federal courts. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:46 am
New Criteria for Sexual Harassment Training Since 2005, California has required that employers with 50 or more employees provide sexual harassment prevention training to supervisory employees every two years. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:15 am
He also sought relief under a state whistleblower statute and under the common law theory of tortuous interference with advantageous business relations. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
On some occasions, demonstrators asked to speak with a manager or presented written demands to a supervisory employee. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am
In the absence of sufficient oversight and standards, firms providing digital asset services may provide inadequate protections for sensitive financial data, custodial and other arrangements relating to customer assets and funds, or disclosures of risks associated with investment. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:01 pm
Dart, October 23, 2021, Kendall, V.). [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 12:01 pm
Dart, October 23, 2021, Kendall, V.). [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]
