Search for: "State v. Stave"
Results 41 - 60
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” Staving off immediate dismissal, a Traverse hearing will be held. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 2:04 pm
In 2016’s U.S. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:35 pm
Has the United States Supreme Court backed away from its landmark toughening of the test for pleading a claim in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
There's red tide in Texas, salinity levels in state waters are way off in Mississippi, and Louisiana has fallen behind Washington state in oyster production. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 10:31 am
Straub v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:30 pm
In State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:55 am
Since the 1st isn't doing anything, I will tell people to look at the 4th Circuit's decision in Cummings v. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 1:36 pm
Trial Court Denies Class Action Certification Motion In Illinois State Court Employment Law Class Action Case Holding that Plaintiffs' Attorneys Failed to Provide a "Reasonable and Accurate Method of Calculating Damages on a Classwide Basis" Only a month after the Ninth Circuit upheld certification of a sex discrimination class action against Wal-Mart involving upwards of 2 million class members, see Dukes v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:52 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:33 am
Klinger v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:16 am
See also Pennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
At that point, most states will probably continue to include Trump’s name on their general election ballots (especially if their state laws don’t authorize any exclusion, which might be true in the vast majority of states). [read post]
22 May 2016, 10:03 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:43 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 4:27 am
Johnson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
InVantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
Thus, when the states prevailed in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:44 pm
Doing so, the state told the Justices, would stave off the “voter confusion” that might ensue if the state were not allowed to use the same procedures (including the voter ID requirement) that it used in the March 2016 elections. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
In Miller v. [read post]
