Search for: "State v. Steagall"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2016, 7:08 pm
Carpenter, Legislative Attorney; Edward V. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:07 am
[Thaya Brook Knight, Bainbridge, WLF, Ira Stoll; earlier] Five state legislatures (California, Oregon, Illinois, Maryland, and Connecticut) now push private employers to enlist employees in state retirement plans. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm
So why are California and other states muscling their way into provision of private pensions? [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
Posted by Ira Kay, Pay Governance LLC, on Tuesday, June 6, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Capital markets, Executive Compensation, Financial reporting, Firm performance, GAAP, Incentives, ISS, Long-Term value, Management, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Proxy advisors, Shareholder value, TSR The Failure of Federal Incorporation Law: A Public Choice Perspective Posted by Sung Hui Kim, UCLA School of Law,… [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:21 pm
Legislatures can’t entrench laws against amendments by future legislatures (although the government must honor contractual obligations – for a discussion of these issues, see U.S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 1:37 pm
I had the good fortune of teaching the classic partnership case of Martin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:17 pm
Basel V. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 7:05 am
The Report repeatedly emphasizes that legislation should ensure issuance is limited to insured depository institutions that have access to emergency liquidity and Federal Reserve services.[12] While not mentioned in the Report, this creates significant uncertainty on the ability of entities that have received newly created state bank charters or trust-only charters from being able to issue stablecoins where those bank charters may not result in entities being eligible… [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:29 pm
Legislatures can’t entrench laws against amendments by future legislatures (although the government must honor contractual obligations – for a discussion of these issues, see U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
Other federal banking regulators, as well as most state regulators, also require universal fidelity coverage. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:00 am
V. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
