Search for: "State v. Steven Warner"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
Willig, Is Professor Salop Right That Judge Leon Bungled United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 12:17 pm
If a lawyer says she supports Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
Stock investment, we know from the recently decided 4-4 decision in the Rezulin drug case (Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Mason, 527 F.3d 252, 255 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
Prior to Sandoz I, Arnold J had held a number of claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in pain invalid including claim 1 (pain) and claim 3 (neuropathic pain) (“Warner-Lambert V” according to Arnold J’s nomenclature). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Steven Willis (Bristows) reports: "Since that first rapid response seminar, Arnold J has issued a further judgment concerning Warner-Lambert’s right to amend the Patent after the trial and whether that amounted to an abuse of process (Generics (UK) t/a Mylan v Warner-Lambert [2015] EWHC 3370 (Pat)). [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:56 am
From Stevens v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am
Lone Oak Club, LLC (No. 18-0264) Water Law Ladonna Degan; Ric Terrones; John McGuire; Reed Higgins; Mike Gurley; Larry Eddington; Steven McBride v. the Board of Trustees of the Dallas Police and Fire Pension System (No. 19-0234) Public Employees • State Constitution Wednesday Sep 18 San Antonio River Authority v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Steven Palladino and Viking Financial Group, Inc.Case number: 13-cv-11024 (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts)Case filed: April 30, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: November 18, 2013 12/20/2013 03/20/2014 2013-116 SEC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
Similarly, in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2016], the Court of Appeal recently stated, within the context of an allegation of insufficiency of a Swiss form second medical use claim, that plausibility is a “low threshold test” which “is not designed to prohibit patents for good faith predictions which have some, albeit manifestly incomplete basis”. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:02 am
State Bd. of Inv. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am
Steven E. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
” - Steven M. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
They are not about state of mind. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Stevens, 781 S.W.2d 368, 371 (Tex. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Patterson on the Rowling v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:32 am
Which is Time Warner? [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
George Hotz (Electronic Frontier Foundation) Time Warner Cable – Time Warner, Viacom aim legal guns at each other over iPad app (ArsTechnica) [read post]
