Search for: "State v. Stocker"
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
This was certainly the stated view of Mrs Stocker after court. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:00 am
In Stocker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:05 am
Because she failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination, she could not prove that Walmart failed to accommodate her disability, ruled the Eighth Circuit, affirming summary judgment against her ADA and state-law disability bias claims (Kelleher v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 7:13 am
In this current opinion in the matter of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
The case is entitled Kennedy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:44 am
Less than six months later, in March 2013, he was issued a second written coaching for low productivity, which stated he failed to meet the stocking and picking deadlines of 2-1/4 hours and ½ hour, respectively). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 6:37 am
The plaintiff applied to be a stocker in Lowe’s Honolulu store. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 4:08 pm
This term there was one Supreme Court media law judgment, in Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17) – in which the appeal was allowed and the finding was in favour of the defendant. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
A good example of this is Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17; [2018] EWCA Civ 170; [2016] EWHC 474 (QB) in which the meaning of five words “he tried to strangle me” went all the way on appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
A welcome move away from the reasoning in Stocker v Stocker, in which the High Court and Court of Appeal held (before being overturned by the Supreme Court) that a woman had defamed her ex-husband in saying he tried to strangle her when it “was beyond dispute” that he had grasped her by the throat so tightly as to leave red marks on her neck visible to police officers two hours later. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:35 pm
Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers (referred to a judge, 27 October 2017) [pdf] AlSaifi v Trinity Mirror PLC and Board of Directors and Anr Butt v The Secretary of State for the Home Department The Queen on the application of The News Media Association v The Press Recognition Panel and Anr ABC (A Mother) v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [read post]
20 May 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
Stocker v Stocker, heard 24 Jan 2019. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm
The court reiterated the principles as set out in Jeynes v News Magazine Ltd [2008] EWCA, Civ. 130, as affirmed in Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17. [read post]
