Search for: "State v. Stokes" Results 321 - 340 of 444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2011, 10:48 am by chrislaughton@mercerhole.co.uk
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:48 am by Chris Laughton
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am by Kiran Bhat
Massimo Calabresi of Time Magazine’s Swampland blog recaps last week’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
"[A] party's awareness of the requirements of the CSSA is not the dispositive consideration under the statute" (Lepore v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Fourth Amendment fans and foes alike are awaiting oral arguments this fall in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:41 am by Rick Hasen
Von Spakovsky’s Brooklyn tale plays a role in the expansive propaganda campaign promoted by Republican Party operatives to stoke the anger of the party’s rightwing base (via the code word “fraud”), and to soften up a mostly disinterested public skeptical of backward-moving restrictions on the franchise – like the requirement to show a current government-issued ID to vote. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:47 am by Rick Hasen
Why on earth would the Obama campaign seek to stoke these conspiracy theories, and cause confusion, by naming its efforts Project Vote? [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:00 am by Enchanta Jackson
article=2051. 2 The Official Dark Girls Movie Website: The Story of Color, Gender, and Race, at http://officialdarkgirlsmovie.com/. 3 Interview with Lorena Luna (2011). 4 Cara V. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 7:32 pm by My name
  The fact that the funding comes from the taxpayers may stoke public anger about bailouts, which would make regulators hesitant to step in until absolutely necessary. [read post]