Search for: "State v. Stolzman" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Employee’s termination after the loss or expiration of license required to perform the duties of the position does not constitute disciplinary action
6 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Matter of Stolzman v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 09136, decided on December 10, 2009, Appellate Division, Third Department Michael A. [read post]
Adjunct Law Prof Blog - http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs/
Employee’s termination after the loss or expiration of license required to perform the duties of the position does not constitute disciplinary action
14 Dec 2009, 4:15 am
Employee’s termination after the loss or expiration of license required to perform the duties of the position does not constitute disciplinary actionMatter of Stolzman v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 09136, decided on December 10, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMichael A. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Termination resulting from the loss or expiration of a license required to lawfully perform the duties of the position does not constitute discipline
8 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
"See, also, NYPPL summary of Stolzman v New York State Dept. of Transp., 2009 NY Slip Op 09136 at http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2009/12/employees-termination-after-loss-or.html* The Appellate Division noted that prior to his termination, the Department sent Carr a letter indicating its belief that he no longer possessed a minimum qualification of his position and afforded him the opportunity to present documentation establishing that he maintained a valid… [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/