Search for: "State v. Storm"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
The Appeals Court rules, "We hold that § 1365(b)(1)(B) does not apply because the state has commenced no action in court 'to require compliance' with the storm water permit and that § 1319(g)(6)(A)(ii) does not apply because the state has commenced no administrative penalty action comparable to one under the Act. [read post]
21 May 2008, 6:42 pm
Heartwood v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:03 am
Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians of California (Official Tribal Government)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.htmlWhite v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm
Well, I have a new development for you: Earlier today, the Court of Appeals (Maryland's highest court) granted a writ of certiorari (meaning they granted review) in State of Maryland v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:51 am
We obtained a similar result for Security Mutual Insurance Company in New York state court in Finley v. [read post]
6 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
Debro v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:24 am
The case is Alessi v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 2:14 am
The Fifth Circuit yesterday, in the Nationwide v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 12:43 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently reversed the California district court’s decision in the case of Northrop Grumman Corp. v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 6:11 am
The case is styled, Aidee Bazan v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Matthews Church of God & Christ v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
Yeaples v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:48 am
Densmore v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:21 am
., et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 8:02 am
-PH Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement that will bring American bases back to the island nation and the filing of a challenge to China’s nine-dash line in the Philippines v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:06 am
The opinion is styled, John Garcia v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:57 pm
By Dennis Crouch James Taylor v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:17 am
In Rowan v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:28 am
(Note: While I certainly hope that EPA is correct in saying that it has no impact, the United States Supreme Court might disagree with that assessment as it did in last term’s case of Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 9:20 pm
Court: Triennial Review Must Analyze Reasonableness of Water Quality Standards The Arcadia II case, City of Arcadia v. [read post]
