Search for: "State v. Strickland"
Results 101 - 120
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v Kentucky opened the door for an argument that I have always supported-a criminal defense lawyer needs to inform a non-citizen client of the possible immigration consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 6:23 am
" The judge found the claims to be without merit, since the Fourth Circuit does not require unindicted co-conspirators to be named, no statement of facts is required, and the indictment stated the period of the conspiracy.Counsel erred in moving the original indictment into evidence. [read post]
24 May 2012, 12:14 am
Under the classic Supreme Court incompetence of counsel case, Strickland v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 5:19 pm
The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant’s constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:10 am
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 12:54 pm
In this case, the First initially remanded for a new trial (see United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:40 pm
Under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:40 am
Strickland, 860 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2017), and that it survives Stokeling v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:38 pm
Instead, the defendant must show “prejudice” under a reading of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:55 am
The State in both cases, argued that there can be no ineffective assistance under the case of Strickland v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:38 am
(See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
Wood challenged his sentence in state post-conviction proceedings on the ground that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:41 am
AC33330 - Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
The petitioner argues that, because a complete breakdown in the adversarial process occurred, his claim instead is controlled by United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:59 am
True to her word, Judge Gottschall from the Northern District of Illinois has issued a follow up opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
