Search for: "State v. Sutton"
Results 1 - 20
of 600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2024, 6:48 am
The answer is yes.The case is Sutton v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
In addition, the Commissioner noted New York State's Court of Appeals recently sustained the validity of New York’s early mail voter statute, citing Stefanik v Hochul, 2024 NY Slip Op 04236. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 6:00 am
In addition, the Commissioner noted New York State's Court of Appeals recently sustained the validity of New York’s early mail voter statute, citing Stefanik v Hochul, 2024 NY Slip Op 04236. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am
Doe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 1:12 pm
See, e.g., Ison v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 9:36 am
Beck gave a CLE presentation to the Lubbock Area Bar Association titled “United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 8:08 am
But United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 4:51 pm
Labrador v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:49 am
In Grimm v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 7:38 am
or NFIB v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
The “deepened” circuit split the majority identified did not exist, because the only case the plaintiffs claimed was on their side—Judge Jeffrey Sutton’s Sixth Circuit decision in Herr v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 11:23 pm
L.W. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm
The Commissioner will only decide matters in actual controversy and will not render a decision on a state of facts that no longer exists due to the passage of time or a change in circumstances (Appeal of Sutton, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,331; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm
The Commissioner will only decide matters in actual controversy and will not render a decision on a state of facts that no longer exists due to the passage of time or a change in circumstances (Appeal of Sutton, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,331; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
The Commissioner will only decide matters in actual controversy and will not render a decision on a state of facts that no longer exists due to the passage of time or a change in circumstances (Appeal of Sutton, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,331; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
The Commissioner will only decide matters in actual controversy and will not render a decision on a state of facts that no longer exists due to the passage of time or a change in circumstances (Appeal of Sutton, 57 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 17,331; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:36 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
