Search for: "State v. Swim"
Results 1 - 20
of 720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2022, 8:07 am
§7102 In the case of Fraser v O’Black, the jury found that the plaintiff was 30% negligent for the swimming pool accident, but that 70% of the liability fell onto the defendants. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 4:45 pm
" Womack v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:00 pm
(See First Specialty Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:00 pm
(See First Specialty Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Spinning heads and swimming constitutional rights in debates over an accrual rule
18 Apr 2019, 8:11 am
McDonough v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:18 am
Many are young children in swimming pools. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:06 pm
Recently the appellate court heard Henry et al v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 1:12 pm
Co., 43 AD3d at 417; Sheehan v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:25 am
Requiring a lifeguard applicant to take a swim test using a State issued “Speedo” swimsuit is not an act of unlawful discrimination because of ageMatter of Lester v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation, 60 AD3d 680The New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed Roy J. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:03 am
Frazier v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm
Supreme Court first recognized a private cause of action for sexual harassment under Title IX in Gebser v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Requiring a lifeguard applicant to take a swim test using a State issued "Speedo" swimsuit is not an act of unlawful discrimination because of ageMatter of Lester v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation, 2009 NY Slip Op 01651, Decided on March 3, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed Roy J. [read post]
What the Archimedes' Principle and Empty In-Ground Swimming Pools Have to Do With Insurance Coverage
12 May 2010, 11:12 am
HOMEOWNERS – PROPERTY – IN-GROUND SWIMMING POOL – PRESSURE OR WEIGHT OF WATER EXCLUSION – EFFICIENT CAUSE OF LOSS Gravino v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
They could not swim. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:27 pm
Swimming pools pose a risk to children all across the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:02 pm
Justice Aldrich begins this opinion by saying: "If an insured throws someone into a swimming pool intending to get the other person wet, but by mistake does not throw hard enough and so the latter lands on the pool's cement step and suffers injuries, is the incident an 'accident' within the meaning of insurance law? [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:27 am
The US Supreme Court Monday declined to hear the appeal in Balow v. [read post]
