Search for: "State v. Tapper" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am by Giles Peaker
Tapper v Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (unreported, 4 January 2022, County Court at Central London, HHJ Parfitt) This was a section 204 Housing Act 1996 (‘HA 1996’) appeal against a review decision finding that the Appellant was intentionally homeless. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:47 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Yes, the Illinois Attorney General can sue your company for consumer fraud (In re Tapper, 123 B.R. 594 (1991)), (People of State of Ill. ex rel. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Laura Sandwell
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, heard 24 – 27 April 2012. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:06 pm by David Markus
Thirteen states have such laws.The court took up the question in three cases: one from Minnesota and two from North Dakota, which were consolidated for a single argument.In 2013, in Missouri v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Congress has practically concluded its 117th term without passing the Open App Markets Act (OAMA) into law. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
R v Mathew Richard Tapper – Brent Magistrates Court Here Tapper was a private sector landlord prosecuted by Harrow Council for failing to rectify ‘excess cold’ hazards at his property. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:38 am by Adam Chandler
Times, and Jake Tapper at ABC News have the story in full, and Eugene Volokh examines whether the Constitution’s State of the Union Clause might offer the Justices an “adequate excuse” for not attending future addresses. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
In a CNN interview after Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Collins told Jake Tapper that she “would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 12:32 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
The “whole point of a bumper car is to bump” because “who would want to ride a tapper car at an amusement park? [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm by Joseph Fishkin
 They assumed that the meaning of the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]