Search for: "State v. Texas Pet Foods, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
   Grant of review is more likely in cases that present an unsettled legal issues, not to mention one that affects the practice of law in the State of Texas, which the Texas Supreme Court also oversees in its regulatory and administrative capacity. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   Grant of review is more likely in cases that present an unsettled legal issues, not to mention one that affects the practice of law in the State of Texas, which the Texas Supreme Court also oversees in its regulatory and administrative capacity. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm by Ken
So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Aetna Life Insurance, Emprise, Inc., Texas State Medical Board, and the United States Government, and was found not guilty in all 5 cases, you will wish you never wrote your article. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc., No. 15-1062 (natural phenom case of tailoring a diet to a pet’s genomic characteristics) Tas v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
A pig in the parlor or food on the table: is Texas’s Right to Farm Act an unconstitutional mechanism to perpetuate nuisances or sound public policy ensuring sustainable growth? [read post]