Search for: "State v. Thrift" Results 101 - 119 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Michele Berger
However, a recent court case (Jewish Community Centers Development Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
That's the part of the Bankruptcy Code that makes your phone stop ringing and lawsuits stop coming when you file a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Arizona.It's a pretty complicated piece of legislation, and it's fundamentally different from the versions of stays which existed under the Bankruptcy Act (the version of the bankruptcy law that we had in the United States prior to what bankruptcy lawyers called the New Code prior to the 2005 Amendments. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm by Jennings, Strouss & Salmon
State laws may impose additional requirements that are not preempted by the act. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Consumers appropriate & perform luxury brands in unique/unexpected ways: $2000 boots combined w/a thrift store outfit. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Not all state court rules on military pension division are the same. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:38 am by James Hamilton
The company's importance as a source of credit for households, businesses, and state and local governments must also be considered, as well as its source of liquidity for the financial system. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]