Search for: "State v. Tillman" Results 41 - 60 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States could signal a retreat from the Court's willingness--in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Josh Blackman
Calabresi now agrees with Tillman that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:03 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman analyzed various arguments for Trump’s motion to move the New York State prosecution against him to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]