Search for: "State v. Tincher" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
”  Op at p. 18.The TincherSuperior Court went on to state, “Here, the trial court gave a charge on a determinative issue that failed to conform to the applicable law, as stated in Tincher. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Black Brothers Co., 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978), in Tincher v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
  The same result was also reached (albeit without citing Tincher) in Runner v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  To the contrary, the court stated that both prongs of Tincher’s composite risk/utility and consumer expectation tests are ordinarily to be decided by the jury. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In its recent post-Tincher decision in the case of High v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 6:25 am by tortsprof
In late 2014, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 11:20 am by Sean Wajert
Petition for Certification of Questions of State Law, Ebert v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Tincher’ Altered the Law (Somewhat)Back in 2014, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court released its much-anticipated products liability decision in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Notably, Judge Brann also cited to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s recent decision in the Tincher v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall from a previous blog post that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has accepted an appeal in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall from a previous blog post that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has accepted an appeal in the case of Tincher v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
 Thus, we had been speculating that the most likely outcome would be a to vacate and remand after the court decides Tincher v. [read post]