Search for: "State v. Tompkins" Results 101 - 120 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) and its progeny, and as this Court recently reaffirmed in Delarosa v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:18 am by Will Baude
The first features Genevieve Lakier defending Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:36 am by Lawrence Solum
Tompkins, but also displaces a large body of diverse state law without constitutional authorization or any supporting federal interest. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:28 pm by Lawrence Solum
Tompkins and its progeny, a federal court interpreting state law must decide as the state’s supreme court would. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:19 am by kroosevelt
Tompkins is one of our biggest, most important cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:17 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Tompkins, a federal court must follow state supreme court decisions when interpreting state law. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 74 (1938), when federal courts preside over cases brought under their “diversity jurisdiction,” which lets them hear suits involving people from different U.S. states, they applystate law in making relevant decisions. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:04 am
Tompkins was decided seventy years ago, federal courts today are seen as more favorable to corporate and business interests than many of their state-court brethren. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am by Will Baude
[with implications for the pending Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Tompkins abolished the old federal common law and forced federal courts to apply state law in cases heard under diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:45 pm by Ashby Jones
Tompkins Railroad established the principle that federal courts, when hearing cases brought by residents of two states, shall apply state law to substantive issues and federal law to procedural issues. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Lawrence Solum
Tompkins, a federal court must follow state supreme court decisions when interpreting state law. [read post]