Search for: "State v. Tompkins" Results 101 - 120 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
So holds the New York intermediate appellate court in today’s Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 74 (1938), when federal courts preside over cases brought under their “diversity jurisdiction,” which lets them hear suits involving people from different U.S. states, they applystate law in making relevant decisions. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 5:01 am by Bill
Today let's consider Cappiello v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
CAN SPAM: This Infographic Says It All http://t.co/h7TOQEeSZ7 -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-07-02: Geophysical Service v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
EU calls for radical copyright reform in light of internet's disruption http://t.co/Sb03kkzzXm via @V3_co_uk -> The Problem with the Aereo Dissent http://t.co/V3ehYt01Vc -> The United States Supreme Court endorses digital privacy in a landmark decision http://t.co/KGxH3Zu3YP -> The Supreme Court Considers Google Street View http://t.co/vfw3LQLjF7 -> New guidelines on data ownership and liability could be issued to address 'internet of things' phenomenon… [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:19 am by kroosevelt
Tompkins is one of our biggest, most important cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
  We are told we have enjoyed some of our trips to the state.) [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 3:30 am by Sergio J. Campos
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), the Supreme Court famously ruled that a federal court cannot displace state common law with its own common law. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:22 pm
Tompkins, Summary of MC99 Judicial Updates 2013 [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Co v United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, the appeals court noted that it plainly reaffirmed Bremen’s identification of a strong public policy supporting the enforcement of forum selection clauses. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:40 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Third, the Supreme Court should replace the rule from Klaxon v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
Tompkins that federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction should not usurp the function of state appellate courts and predict expansions of state tort law. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 2:01 pm by Jordan Bublick
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), including the conflict of law rules of the state in which the federal court sits. [read post]