Search for: "State v. Torelli"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Jeremy reports.* The harbour's no longer safe: personal data flow must find another way to goValentina Torelli tells all about the CJEU's decision in case C-362/14 Maximilian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which the CJEU rendered last week. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
[2016] EWHC 188 (Pat) is about the most recent practice direction which aligns the UK regime with the fast-approaching UPC's stated intention that all cases will be done and dusted within a year. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Not so long ago, Valentina Torelli was one of our three carefully selected guest colleagues -- and here she is again, this time with her take on an important data protection ruling from Europe's top court, a ruling that may not have made a lot of Americans very happy. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am
The case is Martha Foster et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
This is what the General Court concluded, referring to Case T-418/07 LIBRO v OHIM – Causley (LiBRO), and confirming the approach adopted in Specsavers. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:02 pm
Former Guest Kat, Valentina Torelli, has reported on the recent decision by the Supreme Court of Italy in this regard. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:33 pm
In a previous blog post, here, former Guest Kat Valentina Torelli discussed the scope of protection of the new data protection regime and the new types of personal data introduced by Regulation no. 679/2016 - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). [read post]
14 May 2017, 5:53 am
Former Guest Kat Valentina Torelli has kindly provided IPKat with a report of notable decision recently given by the CJEU regarding the scope of judicial review. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 4:32 am
In this latter regard, it is worth emphasising that in the contested decisions the Board of Appeal cited Develey ('Plastikflaschenform') T-129/04, paragraph 19, which stated that… where the Board of Appeal finds that the trade mark sought is devoid of intrinsic distinctive character, it may base its analysis on facts arising from practical experience generally acquired from the marketing of general consumer goods which are likely to be known by anyone and are in… [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 10:11 pm
Former Guest Kat Valentina Torelli has taken a close look at the new General Data Protection Regulation. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
KG v OHIM, Wedl & Hofmann GmbH) . [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
" A spot of sparring in the States. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
Valentina Torelli on the IPKat blog has looked at the proposal for the ePrivacy regulation. [read post]
